header-logo header-logo

20 September 2006 / Nick Ryder
Issue: 7289 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Terror funds

Charities and terrorist funding: where does your donation go? Nick Ryder reports

Before the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001 (9/11), the international community’s attitude towards financial crime focused on the prevention of money laundering, the illegal drugs trade and fraud. The events of 9/11 resulted in a monumental shift in political attitudes and led to a financial war on terrorism. Terrorist finance was combated by the United Nations (UN) in its Declaration to Eliminate International Terrorism 1994.
The International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism 1999 defines funds for terrorism to include assets of every kind, whether tangible or intangible, movable or immovable, however acquired, and legal documents or instruments in any form.

sources of funding

Terrorists have traditionally relied upon two sources of funding: state and private sponsors. State-sponsorship of terrorism is where governments provide logistical and financial support to terrorist organisations. It is now more likely, due to the financial war on terrorism, that terrorists will obtain funding from private donors or sponsors.
The funding of terrorism is difficult to prevent because there is an abundant number of sources available, eg

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll