header-logo header-logo

01 July 2020
Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-detail

Tech protocol for international arbitration could ‘change future’

Six law firms have collaborated to launch a draft protocol on the use of tech in international arbitration

The draft protocol, which was released this week for wider consultation, addresses how parties in arbitration can practically and cost-effectively meet their obligations regarding data handling and cybersecurity. It has been drawn up by Hogan Lovells, CMS, Herbert Smith Freehills, Ashurst, DLA Piper and Latham & Watkins. LexisNexis also participated in a private consultation period conducted recently in respect of the protocol. The six firms aim to release a post-consultation draft later this year.

Technology and digitisation in arbitration is changing how dispute resolution practices operate, and arbitral parties are keen to maximise cybersecurity and data protection measures. The protocol will have global application and has therefore been designed to be flexible and take into account all jurisdictions.

Michael Taylor, associate at Hogan Lovells, said: ‘We are delighted to participate in this initiative and to help shape discussions around the role of new technologies in the arbitration process.

‘Dispute resolution is changing at a fast pace, and securing a consistent approach to arbitral procedures and cybersecurity across the industry is vital. This is particularly important now in light of the COVID-19 situation around the world and as flexible working becomes more common.’

Myfanwy Wood, senior international arbitration lawyer at Ashurst, said: ‘This initiative has the ability fundamentally to change the future of arbitration.

‘New technologies have a critical role to play in improving the efficiency, cost-effectiveness, security, transparency and to widen access to the arbitration process. Having an industry-wide protocol to act as a reference point for parties on key issues to consider when adopting new digital case management platforms will accelerate this process significantly.’

The draft ‘Protocol for Online Case Management in International Arbitration’ is available for consultation until 31 August 2020. It can be viewed at: bit.ly/3dMtjQt. Comments should be emailed to platforms.protocol@hsf.com.

Issue: 7894 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Arbitration
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll