header-logo header-logo

04 April 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing times

Peter Vaines rounds up the latest developments in the world of tax

Previously I made reference to the case of HMRC v P A Holdings Limited (see 160 NLJ 7398 & 7399, p 22) and I make no apology in returning to this really important matter, having regard to the recent Court of Appeal judgment ([2011] EWCA CIV 1414).

HMRC v P A Holdings Ltd

The facts were quite complicated, but in essence, some employees acquired shares in a company connected with their employer. In principle, the receipt of the shares by the employees would represent taxable earnings.
 
The issue was the tax treatment of the dividends subsequently paid by the company on those shares. HMRC argued that the dividends derived from the employment and should, therefore, be taxed as earnings. 

The First-tier Tribunal found that the dividends were correctly categorised as dividends. They also found that they could be treated as earnings, but that did not stop them being dividends. 

Taxing dividends

So, if they were dividends and could also be earnings, how should they be taxed as
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll