header-logo header-logo

04 September 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7335 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines turns the spotlight on trading losses, unlawful dividends… and deep gains

Where a company transfers its trade to another company, s 343 of the Taxes Act 1988 allows the successor company to be treated as continuing carrying on the same trade and to benefit from the accumulated trading losses. However, s 343 requires there to be at least 75% common ownership of the companies before and after the transfer and that the successor company actually carries on the relevant trade.

The recent case of Barkers of Malton Limited v HMRC SpC 689 was concerned with the application of s 343 and it was agreed that all the relevant conditions were satisfied —except one. The only question for consideration was whether or not the successor company continued to carry on the trade in question.

The background is not really important, but the business had been failing and needed to be separated from a valuable property, so the trade was transferred to a subsidiary and then on to another company. Unfortunately, the first transfer took place at 9am and the second transfer took place at

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll