header-logo header-logo

16 May 2019 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7840 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

In his roundup of the latest tax cases, Peter Vaines minds the GAAP, & ponders the difference between a car & a van

  • The tax position of goodwill of a professional practice.
  • Deciding whether a building is a ‘dwelling’.
  • Cars, vans and income tax on a benefit in kind.
  • Minding the GAAP.

The recent case of Richard Villar v HMRC [2018] TC 6983 considered the tax implications of a sale of goodwill by a professional person, and is very helpful in clarifying the law in this area.

Mr Villar had a successful medical practice and he sold the business as a going concern to Spire Healthcare Diagnostics Limited for £1m. Mr Villar said that the consideration should be assessed to capital gains tax. However, HMRC argued that the payment was subject to income tax.

A crucial part of the HMRC argument was that virtually the whole of the payment was attributable to goodwill and they said it could not be transferred to Spire because the goodwill was personal to him.

HMRC also argued that there was no business to dispose of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll