header-logo header-logo

30 June 2017
Issue: 7752 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

nlj_7752_vaines

Peter Vaines tackles penalties, prison & other principal residences

  • Failure to submit a zero return.
  • Doing time: an unexpected or unusual event?
  • New twist on principal private residence.

The case of Kaczmarczyk v HMRC TC 5744 has some hair-raising implications. Mr Kaczmarczyk was issued with a tax return but he did not send it back because he had no taxable income or gains for the year. However, HMRC still imposed a penalty of £3,500 for failing to submit a zero return. Their grounds derived from s 8 of TMA 1970, which says that the taxpayer ‘may be required by a notice given to him by an officer of the Board to make and deliver to the officer a return containing such information as may reasonably be required in pursuance of the notice’.

The tribunal held that upon receipt by a person of a notice under s 8, the recipient has an obligation to file a tax return for the year—and failure to do so gives rise to a penalty under Sch 55 of the Finance Act 2009. (I wonder if this extends to failing

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll