header-logo header-logo

22 April 2016 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7695 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

001_nlj_7695_vaines

Peter Vaines wonders what all the fuss is over the Panama Papers & reports on other recent developments in the world of tax

All this business about the Panama Papers is driving me bonkers. Everybody is getting themselves all worked up about the tax issues relating to funds deposited in Panama—but these revelations have got very little to do with tax. It seems much more likely that most of the money is not put there to escape tax (such people are hardly likely to have been paying tax anyway) but to conceal the proceeds of crime, money laundering and corruption—on a biblical scale. Indeed, in the published list of people who had money in Panama, there is a whole section entitled “Organised Crime”.

It never ceases to amaze me how in some countries, a perfectly ordinary person can be elected to high office and before very long is able to accumulate untold millions (or billions) of pounds without anybody really getting too fussed about it. It is difficult to see any legitimate way in which such riches can have been acquired—and they obviously need to be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll