header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

nlj_7659_vaines

Peter Vaines explores the ins and outs of non-residents capital gains tax

We now have the non-residents capital gains tax in place and I think we can be sure it will never go away. Taxes rarely do (although I do remember development land tax being abolished in 1985).

Most non-residents who have an interest in a UK residential property will now be liable to capital gains tax on its disposal. This might catch out a few non-residents because it will also apply to disposals by way of gift and to deemed disposals. We know all about those concepts here, but they might come as a shock to some foreign owners who are unfamiliar with the principles of UK tax.

However, the tax will only be chargeable on the increase in value from 6 April 2015. This will be done either by rebasing or by an election for time apportionment. A frequent question is whether the client should obtain a professional valuation on 6 April 2015 for the purposes of the new charge.

HMRC recommend a professional valuation at 6 April 2015 but there are serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll