header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

vaines

In his latest update on the world of tax Peter Vaines has mixed opinions on new guidance from HMRC

Over 2,600 lawyers in 44 offices located in 21 countries on five continents.

The new rules for accelerated payments and follower notices are now in force so that anybody who has participated in a disclosure of tax avoidance scheme, or in due course has an arrangement which is given the thumbs down by the GAAR Advisory Panel, is likely to have to pay the disputed tax up front.

Actually, there does not need to be any tax in dispute. Indeed, it seems clear that in many cases there will be no dispute. But you still have to pay the tax until such time as HMRC decide (if they do) that it is not disputed.

The same applies to a follower notice where HMRC is of the opinion that there is a final judicial ruling in another case which if applied to your case, would deny the tax advantage. HMRC can then ask you to pay the tax. You do not have to, but you

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll