header-logo header-logo

08 August 2014 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7618 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

commercial_tax_vaines

Peter Vaines on strict liability criminal offences from Mars, punitive penalties & disguised salaries

HMRC has published a guidance note entitled No Safe Havens 2014. It has caused a lot of trouble. However, the substantive document looks wholly uncontroversial—indeed it seems to be an excellent summary of how HMRC gains access to information on offshore accounts, making it pretty clear that if you have an offshore account, they will find it—and when they do, there will be serious consequences with penalties up to 200% of the tax evaded.

Of course, there should be criminal penalties for people who evade taxes; that is a crime and should be appropriately punished. So why has it caused trouble? It is because in the foreword there is a sentence which says that the government will introduce a new strict liability criminal offence that could mean jail for those who do not declare taxable offshore income.

The two offending words are “strict liability” so that you are guilty even if there was no intention to commit a crime. The idea of a strict liability criminal offence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll