header-logo header-logo

21 February 2008 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Taxing Matters

RESIDENCE: COUNTING THE DAYS

The details have now been published about how days are to be counted for the purposes of determining UK residence. From 6 April 2008, days of arrival and departure will be counted as days in the UK. There are two strands to this proposal—a statutory change and change of practice. The statutory tests for both income tax and capital gains tax are that an individual will be resident in the UK if he spends 183 days or more in the UK. This has been the statutory rule for a couple of hundred years. There is no guidance about how you calculated the 183 day rule but the case of Wilkie v IRC [1952] Ch 153, [1952] 1 All ER 92 decided that hours and minutes could be taken into account in determining whether the limit was breached. The published HMRC practice for the last 50 years has been to ignore days of arrival and departure in counting days for the 183-day test and the same practice has been applied to the 91-day rule; if a person spends an average of 91 days in the UK over four years, they are normally treated as resident and ordinarily resident from the beginning of the fifth year.

From 6 April 2008, a day of presence for the purpose of calculating residence will include days on which the individual arrives in or departs from the UK. There will be an exception for transit passengers who do not leave the boat or aircraft, or stay airside. That will be the statutory rule and will apply only to the 183-day test. However, HMRC has announced that it will change its practice from 6 April 2008 in relation to the 91-day average so that for the purposes of this test the days of arrival and departure will similarly be taken into account.

Implications

While in principle this seems like a simple enough change, the implications are rather more wide ranging. If days of arrival and departure are both counted, what really matters is if you are in the UK at midnight because if you are, that is bound to count as two days.

Mr Brown seems to think that people who come here on Tuesday and leave on Thursday will become resident and be subject to UK tax. Er no. Wake up. They won’t come…or if they do, they will make quite sure that they do not stay the night but leave on the last flight. Similarly, they will not want to come here the night before a meeting so as to be refreshed and properly prepared; that would just add one more day to their tally so there is going to be a considerable demand for more early morning flights to the UK and more late flights out of the UK—and a corresponding reduction in the demand for hotel accommodation. Good news for foreign airlines and foreign hotels—but nobody in their right mind could think that this is anything but damaging to Great Britain Plc.

 

Issue: 7309 / Categories: Legal News , Public , Tax , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll