header-logo header-logo

01 March 2013 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7550 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

istock_000012097953medium_1

Peter Vaines casts his eye over sham loans, the shortcomings of joint bank accounts from an inheritance tax perspective & discovery assessments

The recent case of Murray Group Holdings Limited v HMRC TC 2372 concerned the tax implications of a loan to an employee from an employee benefit trust (EBT). We all know what the implications of loans are now—complete catastrophe—but that was not the case before the introduction of Pt 7A of the Income Tax (Earnings and Pensions) Act 2003 (ITEPA 2003) in April 2011.

Rangers Football Club had an EBT and the trustees made loans to employees and their families. HMRC argued that the full amount of the loans was taxable as earnings in the hands of the employees.

As this case dealt with events prior to April 2011 and you cannot have loans anymore, this may seem to be of rather limited interest. However, it does expose aspects which have a much wider application.

HMRC said that these loans were shams (ie, they were not really loans; they were made to look like loans but in truth they were something

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll