header-logo header-logo

05 October 2012 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7532 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines some recent tax-related cases

The recent case of Bourges-Maunoury: C-558/10 [2012] All ER (D) 153 (Jul) has real possibilities. The issue here was that the taxpayers (actually, the non-taxpayers) were employed by the EU and received earnings and pensions as a result of that employment. They were resident in France and in principle liable to wealth tax. The French tax authorities regarded the funds derived from their employment with the EU as part of their wealth for wealth tax purposes and this was upheld by the French courts.

However, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has declared that member states cannot impose any taxation which is based wholly or partly on the payment of salary to the official by the EU.

We do not have any wealth tax in the UK but we do have inheritance tax and it is not difficult to conclude that funds which can be traced to the earnings from an EU employment, cannot have UK taxes imposed upon them.

Indeed, I do not see why the purchase of a UK residential property by a company funded entirely

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll