header-logo header-logo

Taxing matters

31 March 2011 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7459 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines serves up an exclusive on residency, asset transfers & VAT on roller blinds

The latest decision in the saga of Grace v HMRC was published on 1 February and regrettably the clarification for which we yearn on the subject of residence is as far away as ever.

Grace was a South African pilot who came to the UK in 1986 and was employed by British Caledonian. He had a house near Gatwick. In 1997 his marriage was dissolved and he went back to South Africa. He retained his UK house which he used in order to rest, before or after carrying out his duties as a long haul pilot. In the following three years he visited the UK for 41, 71 and 70 days. Grace thought he was not resident.  However, HMRC considered that he had remained a UK resident. Grace appealed to the Special Commissioners, representing himself, and demonstrated to the tribunal that he had made a distinct break from the UK and had become non resident in 1997. A rare and highly commendable success.

The case was remitted to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll