header-logo header-logo

09 September 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7432 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines the second coming of the Finance Act

The Emergency Budget turned quickly into a Finance Act and contained some helpful clarification about the new capital gains tax rules. It was interesting to note that the day before our Budget, Russia decided to scrap capital gains tax (CGT) as a measure intended to increase economic activity. Huh. Don’t they know that you increase economic activity by big increases in taxation.

There are some transitional provisions in respect of capital gains tax to deal with gains arising before and after Budget day. There was considerable uncertainty on Budget day about the meaning of gains “arising” because those arising before 23 June are taxable at 18% and those arising afterwards may be charged at the 28% rate.

A similar uncertainty existed relating to individuals taxed on the remittance basis where a gain was made on a disposal before Budget day but was not remitted until after Budget day. The new rule is that the date of remittance will determine whether the gains are treated as arising before or after 23 June. Just to make

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll