header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines the Pre-Budget Report, including elements that were conspicuous by their absence

The chancellor’s Pre-Budget Report did not really contain many surprises—we all knew he was going to get the bankers—we just did not know quite how. More of that in a moment.

It is quite interesting to see what he did not do:
i) He did not increase the rate of capital gains tax beyond the existing 18% level.
ii) He did not increase the corporation tax small companies rate as planned, so it remains at 21%—the main rate remains at 28%.
iii) He did not increase National Insurance Contributions (NIC) any more for the moment—although they are still planned to go up 0.5% next year, and again in 2011.
iv) He did not increase VAT beyond the 17.5% he had already proposed.
v) He will not be putting up personal allowances or the basic rate band next year.
vi) He did not alter the earlier proposal of a 50% rate on earnings over £150,000.

However, what he did do is to fiddle with inheritance tax (expected saving: too small to be measured) and he did bash the bankers.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll