header-logo header-logo

07 January 2010 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7399 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines examines the Pre-Budget Report, including elements that were conspicuous by their absence

The chancellor’s Pre-Budget Report did not really contain many surprises—we all knew he was going to get the bankers—we just did not know quite how. More of that in a moment.

It is quite interesting to see what he did not do:
i) He did not increase the rate of capital gains tax beyond the existing 18% level.
ii) He did not increase the corporation tax small companies rate as planned, so it remains at 21%—the main rate remains at 28%.
iii) He did not increase National Insurance Contributions (NIC) any more for the moment—although they are still planned to go up 0.5% next year, and again in 2011.
iv) He did not increase VAT beyond the 17.5% he had already proposed.
v) He will not be putting up personal allowances or the basic rate band next year.
vi) He did not alter the earlier proposal of a 50% rate on earnings over £150,000.

However, what he did do is to fiddle with inheritance tax (expected saving: too small to be measured) and he did bash the bankers.

The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll