header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

DOMICILE >>
RESIDENCE >>
CAPITAL GAINS TAX >>

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

It is no surprise to find that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is flexing its muscles with the banks and is doing its best to extend their reach for information beyond the five major UK banks where it had such success earlier this year. It is reported that they have had “exploratory” talks with 170 banks (this is odd—the last announcement said they were approaching 500) to assist them in deciding what to do next.

HMRC must be hard at work examining all the disclosure notifications which it received prior to 22 June and it will be even busier after 26 November, which is the date by which all the details must be delivered and the tax paid. It has until 30 April 2008 to decide whether or not to accept the disclosures and charge the reduced penalty or whether to start an enquiry into the taxpayer’s affairs. I expect that those who missed the June deadline or who miss the November deadline are in for an anxious time—not least because HMRC have explained that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll