header-logo header-logo

22 November 2007 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7298 / Categories: Features , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

DOMICILE >>
RESIDENCE >>
CAPITAL GAINS TAX >>

OFFSHORE ACCOUNTS

It is no surprise to find that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) is flexing its muscles with the banks and is doing its best to extend their reach for information beyond the five major UK banks where it had such success earlier this year. It is reported that they have had “exploratory” talks with 170 banks (this is odd—the last announcement said they were approaching 500) to assist them in deciding what to do next.

HMRC must be hard at work examining all the disclosure notifications which it received prior to 22 June and it will be even busier after 26 November, which is the date by which all the details must be delivered and the tax paid. It has until 30 April 2008 to decide whether or not to accept the disclosures and charge the reduced penalty or whether to start an enquiry into the taxpayer’s affairs. I expect that those who missed the June deadline or who miss the November deadline are in for an anxious time—not least because HMRC have explained that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll