header-logo header-logo

08 January 2020 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7869 / Categories: Features , Commercial , Tax
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

13678
Peter Vaines puts HMRC in the dock & expects the truth, the whole truth & nothing but the truth
  • Reliance on HMRC manuals & the automatic issue of HMRC notices…with a nod to crypto currencies & IHT.

It is a matter of profound importance that taxpayers and professional advisers are able to rely on the published statements of HMRC in connection with their own tax affairs and the affairs of their clients. The very idea that we might not be able to trust the public statements of one of the most important and prestigious organs of government, must surely be unthinkable.

It is in this context that the recent decision of the Court of Appeal in Aozora GMAC Investment Ltd v HMRC [2019] EWCA Civ 1643 assumes some importance.

The case was all about whether the company was entitled to double taxation relief which had been refused by HMRC on the authority of s 793A of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (ICTA 1988). The company said that HMRC’s interpretation of s 793A was wrong—but crucially, even if HMRC were

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll