header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Tax , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taxing matters

Peter Vaines is intrugued by a Revenue U-turn and the meaning of residency

HM Revenue & Customs have issued a statement relating to last years’ limited amnesty for undisclosed offshore accounts. It will be remembered that an opportunity arose for those with such accounts to disclose them and pay a fixed 10% penalty rather than to feel the full weight of the Revenue falling on them for lack of disclosure. The Revenue does not like to call this an amnesty because nobody is being relieved of any tax; they are just paying a limited penalty. The term off shore disclosure facility is the preferred term.

The Revenue had the advantage of a successful application to the courts for the disclosure of offshore bank accounts of the customers of a number of the major banks. This meant that those with such accounts could never be sure whether the details had already been provided to the Revenue and they ought therefore to come clean for fear of worse consequences awaiting them. The Revenue subsequently issued a statement warning that those who failed to disclose would be subject

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll