header-logo header-logo

24 November 2011
Issue: 7491 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Taxation

Foggia - Sociedade Gestora de Participacoes Sociais SA v Secretario de Estado dos Assuntos Fiscais: C-126/10 [2011] All ER (D) 134 (Nov)

Article 11(1)(a) of Council Directive (EEC) 90/434 (on the common system of taxation applicable to mergers, divisions, transfers of assets and exchanges of shares concerning companies of different member states) had to be interpreted as meaning that, in the case of a merger operation between two companies of the same group, the fact that, on the date of the merger operation, the acquired company did not carry out any activity, did not have any financial holdings and transfer to the acquiring company only substantial tax losses of undetermined origin, even though that operation had a positive effect in terms of cost structure savings for that group, might constitute a presumption that the operation had not been carried out for “valid commercial reasons” within the meaning of Art 11(1)(a) of the directive.

It was incumbent on the national court to verify, in the light of all the circumstances of the dispute on which it was required to rule, whether the constituent elements of the presumption of tax

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll