header-logo header-logo

Tax reform

11 September 2014
Issue: 7621 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Law Society has published its response to HMRC’s June consultation on trust inheritance tax charges, Inheritance Tax: a fairer way of calculating trust charges, giving a qualified welcome to the proposed settlement nil-rate band.

However, it expressed disappointment that HMRC had not done away with charges for 18-25 trusts. It also drew attention to two “significant omissions”, namely the “three-month anomaly” and “the fact that trusts in which the settlor has reserved a benefit are taxed twice”.

It welcomed HMRC’s proposal not to introduce retrospective anti-fragmentation rules to old trusts, and to simplify the calculation of trust charges on old trusts.

It also recommended aligning the filing date with self-assessment by reconsidering the Finance Act 2014 changes.

Issue: 7621 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll