header-logo header-logo

04 February 2016
Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax on feelings

Income tax may be levied on payments made for injury to feelings, the Upper Tribunal has held.

Moorthy v HMRC [2016] UKUT 13 TCC concerned the extent to which a payment made by an employer to settle a claim for unfair dismissal and age discrimination following termination by redundancy could be liable to income tax.

The employee, Moorthy, received from his employer statutory redundancy pay of £10,640 and, following mediation over his claim, £200,000 compensation for loss of office and employment.

A dispute arose between Moorthy and HMRC over whether compensation for injury to feelings was taxable.

Delivering her judgment, Mrs Justice Rose held that, while payment made “on account of injury to an employee” is tax-exempt, the “injury” must be a medical condition not injury to feelings.

Issue: 7685 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll