header-logo header-logo

07 September 2015
Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Tax the City?

City law firms should make a financial contribution to legal aid, through a “tax” if need be, according to Geoffrey Bindman QC.

Writing in NLJ this week, Bindman, former leading legal aid solicitor and NLJ columnist, has backed the Lord Chancellor Michael Gove’s proposal that City firms contribute more to legal aid. However, he notes that “efforts to persuade prosperous lawyers to make a major contribution to the funding of legal services have a long history without significant result”.

Bindman argues that City law firms’ main contribution “must be financial” both because existing City pro bono programmes, although “highly commendable”, have “considerable limitations” due to a lack of expertise in the legal area concerned and because charitable efforts by the profession to raise funds for legal services “have not filled the gap”.

He suggests a levy of 10% on incomes over £150,000 which could be paid through a charity and therefore tax deductible.

City firms failed to welcome Gove’s suggestion, in June, that they contribute more. However, most of them already have substantial pro bono programmes and all do pro bono work, some of which is ground-breaking and innovative.

Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, for example, became the first City firm to win a Legal Aid Lawyer of the Year (Laly) award this year, jointly with Royal Courts of Justice Advice Bureau, for their development of Courtnav.

Linklaters has commissioned legal education charity Pro Bono Community to provide its lawyers with a bespoke training programme in housing law. The training covers legal advice at clinics, social security law and housing benefits, and common areas of housing law that arise at the advice clinic Linklaters runs in conjunction with the Mary Ward Legal Centre.

The training is part of Linklaters’ involvement in the Collaborative Plan for Pro Bono in the UK, and will be rolled out to in-house counsel and lawyers at other firms.

Issue: 7667 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll