header-logo header-logo

26 February 2010
Issue: 7406 / Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Tax Avoidance Schemes

Tax Avoidance Schemes (Information) (Amendment)
(SI 2010/410)

Amend the Tax Avoidance Scheme (Information) Regulations 2004 (SI 2004/1864) which prescribe the information to be provided to HMRC when a person is required to notify arrangements under the Finance Act 2004, Pt 7 and the time limits in which that information is to be provided. These Regulations extend the requirement to provide prescribed information to a person who is a party to a disclosed stamp duty land tax (SDLT) avoidance scheme.

Omits regulation 4(5ZA) which has become extraneous, having identical wording to regulation 4(5).

Amends regulation 8 of the 2004 Regulations to prescribe the information that a purchaser must provide and the period within which the purchaser must provide that information.

Regulation 8(17) which disapplied regulation 8 to SDLT is revoked.

 

In force : 1 April 2010

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll