header-logo header-logo

15 April 2016
Issue: 7694 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Walapu v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2016] EWHC 658 (Admin), [2016] All ER (D) 17 (Apr)

The Administrative Court dismissed the taxpayer’s application for judicial review of an accelerated payment notice, showing the amount due of £106,842,02. The court considered the scope and effect of Ch 3 of the Finance Act 2014, which entitled the defendant revenue and customs commissioners to impose upon persons suspected of tax avoidance an obligation to pay on account the amount the Revenue considered represented understated tax.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll