header-logo header-logo

15 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Tax

Armajaro Holdings Ltd v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2013] UKFTT 571 (TC), [2013] All ER (D) 41 (Nov)

Schedule 29 to the Finance Act 2002 applied to goodwill as it applied to an intangible fixed asset. Goodwill in Sch 29 had the same meaning as it had for accounting purposes. Intangible fixed asset was defined by para 2(1) of Sch 29 in relation to a company but not in relation to a partnership or LLP. Entitlement to relief under Sch 29 to the 2002 Act was dependent on the expenditure being reflected in the accounts of the company claiming entitlement to relief. The accounts had to be drawn up in compliance with UK GAAP. Relief under Pt 2 of Sch 29 was given by reference to expenditure written off or written down for accounting purposes. If accounting rules or practice did not permit the expenditure on acquiring an interest in an LLP to be treated as the acquisition of the LLP’s intangible fixed assets included then s 118ZA of the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 did not change the accounting rules or practice or deem the accounts to include something that they

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll