header-logo header-logo

28 October 2010
Issue: 7439 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Tax

Commissioners for Revenue and Customs v Lansdowne Partners Ltd Partnership [2010] EWHC 2582 (Ch), [2010] All ER (D) 183 (Oct)

The question to be asked when considering discovery assessments and s 29 of the Taxes Management Act 1970 was whether an officer of the commissioners had sufficient information to make a decision whether to raise an additional assessment. The statutory reference was to a hypothetical officer rather than a real individual. The hypothetical officer had to be endowed with knowledge of elementary arithmetic, some knowledge of tax law, and some tax law, all of which he would apply to the prescribed sources of information. The test of whether an officer could reasonably have been expected to be aware of an actual insufficiency was an objective test. “Awareness” was the officer’s awareness of an actual insufficiency in the self-assessment in question, rather than an awareness that he should do something to check whether there was an insufficiency. The sources of information referred to in s 29(6) of the Act were the only sources of information to be taken into account in deciding whether an officer ought reasonably to have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll