header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
19 March 2020 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7879 / Categories: Features , Public
printer mail-detail

Tate-à-Tête (Pt 2)

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
17907
Nicholas Dobson revisits the Tate Gallery & discovers that mere overlooking is not nuisance
  • Nuisance is a property tort involving the violation of real property rights.
  • Mere overlooking is outside the scope of common law nuisance.

Things can look very different on revisiting. Charles Ryder, for instance, found radical wartime changes to his former Elysium in Evelyn Waugh’s Brideshead Revisited. And on revisiting Highway 61, Bob Dylan discovered a novel take on the biblical Abraham and Isaac story: ‘God said to Abraham: ‘Kill me a son’/Abe said: ‘Man you must be putting me on’.

The Court of Appeal also saw things differently (while achieving the same outcome) on revisiting the Tate Gallery overlooking case in Fearn and others v Board of the Trustees of the Tate Gallery [2020] EWCA Civ 104 (see Tate-à-tête? NLJ 28 June 2019). The approved judgment was handed down on 12 February 2020 by Sir Terence Etherton MR, Lord Justice Lewison and Lady Justice Rose DBE.

Background

The case concerned a claim by owners of four apartments in a prestige London development

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll