header-logo header-logo

09 June 2011 / Keith Patten
Issue: 7469 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Target practice

Keith Patten investigates the possibility of seeking PI damages from a parent company

First instance decisions of trial judges do not normally call for much in the way of comment, for the obvious reason that they establish no precedent. Every now and then, however, such a case comes along which is important, not as a matter of precedent but as illustration of a significant point. Such a case is the recent decision of Wyn Williams J in Chandler v Cape plc [2011] EWHC 951 (QB), [2011] All ER (D) 157 (Apr). It reminds us that what is often referred to as the law of employers’ liability is, in reality, a part of the wider law of negligence.

The issue

The issue in Chandler is one which will be familiar to practitioners dealing with long tail disease claims. Chandler had been exposed to asbestos while employed by a company called Cape Building Products Limited (the employer company). His employment spanned a period from 1959–1962 and during that period the employer company had no employer’s liability insurance (such insurance did not become compulsory until 1969,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll