header-logo header-logo

18 October 2007 / Elaine Banton
Issue: 7293 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Taming the wildcats

Do no-strike agreements have claws? asks Elaine Banton

Clashes over pay and modernisation have brought much of the country’s postal system to a standstill this month. Recently the threat of further disruption to postal services receded after the Royal Mail and the Communication Workers Union (CWU) reached agreement on pay, pensions and working practices.

The outline agreement was obtained after Royal Mail won a High Court injunction outlawing strikes for two days on the ground that the union had failed to follow the procedure required for notifying their intention to strike. Wildcat strikes had previously hit London, Liverpool and Glasgow after managers tried to introduce new working hours. The London Underground strikes in September 2007 over job security and pensions after Metronet went into administration caused chaos in London. Reported losses to both companies and the economy run into millions of pounds.

WILDCAT ACTION

In August 2007, prison officers staged strike action in breach of a no-strike agreement. The wildcat action by 20,000 of the 30,000 members of the Prison Officers’ Association (POA) led to the Ministry of Justice obtaining an injunction from Mr

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll