header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2021 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-detail

Talkback: is guidance just guidance or not?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
38111
‘Substantial’ meals & staying at home: Fred Philpott compares current guidance with the actual law

I hope to expand upon the excellent article by the employment lawyer Juliet Carp in NLJ of 4 December 2020 (‘What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?’, 170 NLJ 7913, p9–11). I also pay tribute to the incisive piece on the subject by Lord Sumption in The Daily Telegraph (‘It is not the police’s job to enforce the lockdown whims of ministers’, The Daily Telegraph, 12 January 2021).

I wish to review some previous authorities dealing with guidance, and give two examples of how it has been used in the current situation.

I will start first with the coronavirus (COVID-19) example. Some official guidance has been promulgated as regards the work exemption. Some guidance has said, for example, that one must have some sort of formal presentation in order to get within the exemption. That is not so. It illustrates how so many lawyers (including the judiciary) but also businesses, government departments themselves,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll