header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
03 February 2021 / Fred Philpott
Issue: 7919 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Public
printer mail-detail

Talkback: is guidance just guidance or not?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
38111
‘Substantial’ meals & staying at home: Fred Philpott compares current guidance with the actual law

I hope to expand upon the excellent article by the employment lawyer Juliet Carp in NLJ of 4 December 2020 (‘What is ‘guidance’, & do we have to comply with it?’, 170 NLJ 7913, p9–11). I also pay tribute to the incisive piece on the subject by Lord Sumption in The Daily Telegraph (‘It is not the police’s job to enforce the lockdown whims of ministers’, The Daily Telegraph, 12 January 2021).

I wish to review some previous authorities dealing with guidance, and give two examples of how it has been used in the current situation.

I will start first with the coronavirus (COVID-19) example. Some official guidance has been promulgated as regards the work exemption. Some guidance has said, for example, that one must have some sort of formal presentation in order to get within the exemption. That is not so. It illustrates how so many lawyers (including the judiciary) but also businesses, government departments themselves,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS
Read All
Legal notice: Notice under the Trustee Act 1925

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Emergency lawyers on call as international regulatory actions soar
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
NLJ this week: Employment law’s fine margins
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
NLJ this week: Promises broken on non-molestation orders?
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
NLJ this week: Assisted dying under the legal microscope
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll