header-logo header-logo

13 May 2020 / Chavah Apfelbaum
Issue: 7886 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

Taking cover

20592
Could the COVID-19 class action against Hiscox be successful, asks Chavah Apfelbaum

Hiscox Action Group and the Night Time Industries Association have threatened to bring a class/collective action against Hiscox for refusing to pay out business interruption claims arising from disruption caused by COVID-19. The groups collectively represent more than 500 Hiscox policyholders with insurance cover of over £50m.

Given the UK’s national shutdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and the sheer volume of related claims, estimated to cost in excess of £1bn, insurers will be resistant to pay out. The outcome of this class action will set a precedent for future lawsuits against insurers in the wake of COVID-19.

What is covered?

Will the policy cover the effects of a pandemic and losses caused by the national lockdown? The relevant standard Hiscox policy appears to state that policyholders are insured for financial losses resulting from:

  • an interruption to business caused by inability to use the insured premises due to restrictions imposed by a public authority during the period of insurance following an occurrence of a notifiable human disease (defined as any
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll