header-logo header-logo

17 March 2017 / Ben Simpson
Issue: 7738 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Taking control

nlj_7738_simpson

When does a person exercise significant influence or control over the activities of a trust, asks Ben Simpson

  • The impact of the shadow directorship test in the PSC regime on persons who influence trusts.

From 6 April 2016, UK companies, limited liability partnerships (LLPs) and other entities have had to keep a register of persons who have significant control over them (PSCs). The regime for registering PSCs (the PSC regime) is likely to be changed with effect from 26 June 2017 to include other entities, such as Scottish Limited Partnerships and Scottish Partnerships. Indirect economic interests in relevant UK entities are also likely to be caught from 26 June 2017.

Companies and LLPs have to record their PSCs in their first confirmation statement filed after 30 June 2016. In addition, a person incorporating a new company or LLP has to send to Companies House a statement of initial persons with significant control together with the other documents required for an application to incorporate.

A direct or indirect interest in a UK company which attributes a person with significant influence or control and makes them

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll