header-logo header-logo

03 February 2011 / Karen Widdicombe
Issue: 7451 / Categories: Features , In Court
printer mail-detail

Taking the centre court by storm

Karen Widdicombe celebrates 75 years of the All England Law Reports

Seventy-five years ago, in February 1936, the first of a series of general law reports in a startling new form was published. Accurate, authoritative reports of cases had long been available; the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting (ICLR) had started reporting cases in 1865 and the jumble of the “nominate” reports had come to an end. But the authoritative reports were being published slowly. Stanley Bond, the chairman of Butterworths, had a radical idea—a series that published weekly.

Trend setter

The series was named the All England Law Reports; company lore has it that Mr Bond was keen on tennis and took the idea of the series’ name from the pre-eminent All England Lawn Tennis and Croquet Club. Weekly publication proved such a popular and successful idea that the ICLR started its own weekly series, the Weekly Law Reports, in 1953. The trend for faster publication of judgments was set.

By judicial appointment

Reports of judgments in All ER have always been judicially approved prior to publication. Nowadays, with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll