header-logo header-logo

28 July 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Taking back control over retained EU law (Pt 6)

132283
The ping-pong match is finally over: Michael Zander KC reports on the final stages of the Retained EU Law Bill
  • After much to-ing and fro-ing in Parliament, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill finally received royal assent on 29 June 2023.
  • Amendments by the House of Lords which were rejected by the House of Commons included assurances that there would be no slippage in environmental protection.

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill received royal assent on 29 June 2023. The final exchanges (‘ping-pong’) had no less than six iterations. The amendments passed by the Lords at the report stage were considered by the Commons on 24 May. The Bill went back to the Lords on 6 June, back to the Commons on 12 June, back to the Lords on 20 June, back to the Commons on 21 June and, finally, back to the Lords on 26 June.

Sunset schedule

During the report stage in the Lords, the government had abandoned the much-criticised sunsetting of the 5,000 or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll