header-logo header-logo

Taking back control over retained EU law (Pt 6)

28 July 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8035 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
132283
The ping-pong match is finally over: Michael Zander KC reports on the final stages of the Retained EU Law Bill
  • After much to-ing and fro-ing in Parliament, the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill finally received royal assent on 29 June 2023.
  • Amendments by the House of Lords which were rejected by the House of Commons included assurances that there would be no slippage in environmental protection.

The Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill received royal assent on 29 June 2023. The final exchanges (‘ping-pong’) had no less than six iterations. The amendments passed by the Lords at the report stage were considered by the Commons on 24 May. The Bill went back to the Lords on 6 June, back to the Commons on 12 June, back to the Lords on 20 June, back to the Commons on 21 June and, finally, back to the Lords on 26 June.

Sunset schedule

During the report stage in the Lords, the government had abandoned the much-criticised sunsetting of the 5,000 or

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll