header-logo header-logo

Taking back control over retained EU law (Pt 5)

26 May 2023 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 8026 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , EU , Brexit
printer mail-detail
123323
Michael Zander on how the Government’s U-turn was greeted by the House of Lords at the Report stage of the Bill
  • Peers welcomed the Government’s decision to remove 587 pieces of legislation as opposed to nearly 5,000, but there was much criticism of the inadequate time for consideration of the scheduled list.
  • The Scottish and the Welsh legislative assemblies have refused assent to the Bill.

At the end of my piece on the committee stage of the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill I wrote: ‘Might the many cogent criticisms of the Bill advanced from all sides in the debates be reflected in government amendments at the report stage?’. There was no indication then of any such intention, but the Easter break resulted in a major breakthrough.

The sunsetting at the end of this year of what is now thought to be nearly 5,000 items of EU retained subsidiary legislation or retained direct EU legislation is being replaced by the removal on 31 December 2023 of only 587 pieces of legislation.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll