header-logo header-logo

Take-off time for insurance pay-outs?

25 July 2025 / Helen Biggin
Issue: 8126 / Categories: Features , Aviation , Insurance / reinsurance , International
printer mail-detail
226383
Possessed or contingent, war risk or all-risk? Helen Biggin examines the fallout from the Russian aviation insurance claims
  • The English Commercial Court has ruled that Russian Government Resolution 311 was the proximate cause of loss, triggering war risk insurance payouts for lessors deprived of aircraft following Russia’s 2022 invasion of Ukraine.
  • The court confirmed coverage applied if the peril began during the policy period and led to permanent deprivation. Lessors were found to have taken sufficient steps to recover aircraft pre-GR 311.
  • The judgment has application beyond the aviation industry as it provides clarity on the interpretation of insurance policies, causation, loss, and the grip of peril doctrine.

The English Commercial Court has recently handed down a highly anticipated judgment of six consolidated multi-billion-dollar insurance claims arising out of the failure by Russian airlines to return leased aircraft to Western lessors following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 (Aercap Ireland Ltd v AIG Europe SA and others and other cases [2025] EWHC 1430 (Comm)).

The proceedings focused on claims made by lessors

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll