header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail

Take note of Canada’s first online court

nlj_7751_smith

What can we learn from the new Civil Resolution Tribunal? Quite a lot, says Roger Smith

With the government gearing up to introduce online courts, it’s wellworth taking a look across the Atlantic.

On 1 June 2017, Canada’s first online tribunal, the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), began accepting small claims for $5,000 or less in British Columbia (BC). It has already been accepting “strata property” disputes for the past 11 months.

CRT strengths

Regardless of how well the CRT works, the BC courts have certainly succeeded in being transparent. They have posted a blog announcing progress to the world. They have appointed a judge, Shannon Salter, as its head, and she has cultivated a high public profile. The CRT’s website publishes important decisions (three are currently available), which appear to show an online methodology not that far from the traditional. Costs seem reasonable. The fee to issue a case worth less than $3,000 is about £35 if you do it online with another £23 for a hearing. It is too soon to assess any more than the process but this seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll