header-logo header-logo

23 June 2017 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7751 / Categories: Opinion , Technology
printer mail-detail

Take note of Canada’s first online court

nlj_7751_smith

What can we learn from the new Civil Resolution Tribunal? Quite a lot, says Roger Smith

With the government gearing up to introduce online courts, it’s wellworth taking a look across the Atlantic.

On 1 June 2017, Canada’s first online tribunal, the Civil Resolution Tribunal (CRT), began accepting small claims for $5,000 or less in British Columbia (BC). It has already been accepting “strata property” disputes for the past 11 months.

CRT strengths

Regardless of how well the CRT works, the BC courts have certainly succeeded in being transparent. They have posted a blog announcing progress to the world. They have appointed a judge, Shannon Salter, as its head, and she has cultivated a high public profile. The CRT’s website publishes important decisions (three are currently available), which appear to show an online methodology not that far from the traditional. Costs seem reasonable. The fee to issue a case worth less than $3,000 is about £35 if you do it online with another £23 for a hearing. It is too soon to assess any more than the process but this seems

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll