header-logo header-logo

Take control

22 February 2007 / Jay Tayler-webb
Issue: 7261 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Rule 5 need not be an irksome imposition, argues
Jay Tayler-Webb

The new Rule 5—Business Management in England and Wales (rule 5) says principals and directors of solicitors’ practices must “make arrangements for the effective management of the firm as a whole”, including:
 supervision over all staff;
 direction of clients’ matters;
 client care, costs information and complaints handling;
 equality and diversity;
 training;
 financial control of budgets, expenditure and cash flow;
 business continuity; and
 risk management.

Rule 5 also applies to employed supervising lawyers eg heads of department. The latest draft and accompanying guidance are on the Law Society’s website (see www.lawsociety.org.uk).

Compliance and survival

Rule 5 should not be regarded as yet another irksome imposition. Although its purpose is to protect the public, it will benefit law firms too.
Make no mistake, there are expert business managers out there, greedily eyeing up the legal services marketplace. They are jubilant as they watch barriers to entry being demolished by the Legal Services Bill’s progress through Parliament. They have a cunning strategy in place for taking significant market share—your clients—and are already marshalling resources for the onslaught.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll