header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-detail

Tactile voting devices unlawful, High Court rules

The government’s arrangements for blind and partially sighted voters at polling stations are unlawful, the High Court has held.

The judicial review, brought by Rachael Andrews, who is registered blind, challenged the use of tactile voting devices (TVDs), plastic sheets that fit on top of the ballot paper. Andrews argued that voters still need the help of another person to read them the candidates’ names and order of appearance.

The court agreed the device ‘does not in any realistic sense enable that person to vote’, in R (Andrews) v Minister for the Cabinet Office [2019] EWHC 1126 (Admin).

Leigh Day partner Sean Humber, who acted for Andrews, said blind and partially sighted voters ‘should be able to exercise their voting rights in the same way as everyone else―secretly and independently’.

Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll