header-logo header-logo

11 October 2018 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7812 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Suspicionless stop & search: a necessary evil?

Neil Parpworth considers the current arguments and sensitivities surrounding the use of stop and search

  • Stop and search can be authorised for up to 24 hours by an inspector under s 60, Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994.
  • Looks at the ‘find rate’, the ‘hit rate’ and the history of its use as well as the current context.
  • Asserts that increasing its use can escalate tensions therefore it must be confined to the use for which it was intended, gang violence, and used sparingly.

The BBC recently reported that the Metropolitan Police Force was intending to use stop and search powers under s 60 of the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 to combat the potential problem of knife crime at the Notting Hill Carnival. Within a day or two of the relevant authorisation being granted, the Centre for Social Justice published a report, ‘It can be stopped: a proven blueprint to stop violence and tackle gang and related offending in London and beyond’ (August 2018), in which, among other things, its authors argued that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll