header-logo header-logo

07 October 2010
Categories: Case law , Judicial line , In Court
printer mail-detail

Suspending possession

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order...

In residential possession proceedings, can the court make an order a suspended or postponed order for possession by consent of the parties even though it would lack jurisdiction to suspend or postpone in the absence of consent?

The landlord can chose to abandon a mandatory ground for possession which could only lead to an outright order (like ground 8 under the Housing Act 1988) and instead rely on a discretionary ground which can lead to a suspended or postponed order (like grounds 10 or 11). If, however, the law does not afford the court a discretion to suspend or postpone (as with trespassers, for example) then the parties cannot vest it with a discretion by giving their consent to an order. Nevertheless, it is still possible for the landlord to undertake that he will not enforce an order for possession for a certain period or so long as certain conditions are complied with and the undertaking can be incorporated as a recital in the preamble to the possession order.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll