header-logo header-logo

22 October 2015
Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Survey reveals fee income rises

PwC reports marked difference between the fortunes of mid-tier & top-tier firms

Lawyers are crunching numbers after PwC published its annual Top 100 law firm survey.

The 2015 survey uncovered a marked difference between the fortunes of mid-tier and top-tier firms. While fee income is generally up at 82% of law firms (compared to 70% last year) only half the Top 10 enjoyed UK fee income growth.

Profits per equity partner for the top 11-25 law firms increased by 17% (to £641,000), while the 3.5% rise at the Top 10 firms (to £1,067,000) was mainly driven by reductions in the number of equity partners. Top 10 firms’ revenues were also reduced by 3.5% due to Euro exchange rate movement.

The survey suggests that firms’ international operations are diluting their profitability—UK profits per partner at the Top 10 firms are 75% above that of their international colleagues.

As far as profit margins are concerned, the average margin is nearly 40% at Top 10 firms, 29% at Top 11-25 firms, and 24.5% for Top 26-50, while the margin for Top 51-100 firms has reduced by three per cent to 21%.

David Snell, partner and leader of PwC’s Law Firm Advisory Group, says: “Our 2015 Law Firms’ Survey is set in the context of a recovering UK market, but with ongoing challenging macro-economic conditions for global law firms.

“The strength of sterling against the euro has adversely impacted many firms’ international performance on a sterling basis—the basis upon which most firms distribute their profits to partners. However, the UK has enjoyed a more buoyant deals market, greater levels of regulatory activity and an active real estate sector.

“These factors are reflected in our survey, which shows a somewhat disappointing performance from the Top 10 firms, while at the same time a resurgent Top 11-25 who seem to have re-focused their strategic intent.

“Mid-tier City firms in particular have performed well through a combination of sensible lateral hiring programmes, M&A and a focus on cost control and key metrics such as chargeable hours. However, a slow-down in litigation, and difficult conditions in some industry sectors, have been a drag on performance for some in the Top 26-50.”

Issue: 7673 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll