header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

SUPREME RULES

In brief

Lord Bingham, the senior law lord, has launched a consultation on the rules governing practice and procedure in the new Supreme Court, which is due to begin work in October 2009. Interested parties can view the documents online at www.parliament.uk/judicial_work/judicial_work.cfm and submit suggestions by post, fax or e-mail by 10 April 2007. Section 45 of the Constitutional Reform Act 2005 provides that the President of the Supreme Court may make rules governing the practice and procedure of the court. Until a president is appointed, the senior law lord is entitled to exercise the rule-making powers of the court.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll