header-logo header-logo

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-detail

Supreme Court accounts for another record year

In the past year, the Supreme Court has witnessed an increase in both urgent hearings and cases requiring panels of more than five justices.

The court’s Annual Report and Accounts, laid before Parliament this week, reveals the Court sat as a panel of seven or nine in 14% of appeals in 2015/16 compared to 12% and 9% in the previous two years.

Larger panels tend to sit where the court is being asked to depart from a previous decision of the Supreme Court or House of Lords, or where a case raises an issue of particularly high constitutional or public importance. The report shows the number of urgent cases—where initial application proceeds to full judgment within weeks—rose from three in 2014-15 to nine this year.

In total, the court heard 92 appeals in 104 days, and delivered 81 judgments. There were more decisions relating to children, tax and tort law than in previous years.

Unusually, there were no cases considering detention or extradition issues. Permission to appeal was granted in 32% of cases.

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll