header-logo header-logo

13 November 2013
Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Supervising barristers

BSB introduce new supervisory scheme for barristers

“Risky” chambers will be identified and given extra regulatory support under a new supervisory scheme for barristers.

The Bar Standards Board (BSB) will assess how well chambers and sole practitioners are managing potential risks, and those identified as “high risk” will be given extra support to ensure non-compliance does not recur. 

Low-risk chambers, on the other hand, will have little contact with the BSB.

The new scheme begins in January, and the BSB will send chambers an “impact audit survey” in the spring to gauge the effect any breach of the regulatory rules would have on the public. Chambers will then complete a “supervision return form”, showing how they manage potential risks.

BSB head of quality Oliver Hanmer says: “We all know that prevention is better than cure.”

Perceived risks include poor client service, ineffective governance, lack of equality and diversity, incompetent or dishonest financial management, and inadequate pupillage or training.

Stephen Dale, author of the Pupillage Blog, which offers advice to those seeking a career at the Bar, says he welcomes “any safeguards to prevent inadequate or unfair pupillage or training”.

“From the perspective of the pupil who has attained pupillage with a set, their training and ongoing mentoring is crucial to their success as an advocate.”

The BSB advises chambers to ensure their records are up-to-date, appoint a member as a point of contact with the regulator, and be honest and open.

The new scheme replaces the old chambers monitoring system under which chambers were contacted to verify compliance in key areas.

Issue: 7584 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll