header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Summary judgment

JANNA PURDIE provides practical guidance for  practitioners involved in summary judgment applications

References

Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
CPR 24

Summary judgment
There are obvious steps parties can take to make the court process easier and  strengthen their case. Mr Justice Coulson, in a judgment providing valuable guidance  to practitioners, has highlighted some of these. While some apply specifi cally  to summary judgment applications others apply equally well to other forms of  applications.

Facts of the case

The claimant undertook quantity surveying and project management for a  construction project under a consultancy agreement. The defendant terminated that  agreement and the claimant brought proceedings for unpaid invoices of more than  £4m.

The claimant applied for summary judgment on three of the invoices totalling  £755,643.60. The application was resisted. The time estimate was two hours with no  indication that pre-reading was required. The evidence adduced comprised 10 files, and  included lengthy statements. The application took three days of court time.

The summary judgment was partly successful and a conditional order was also made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll