header-logo header-logo

04 December 2008 / Janna Purdie
Issue: 7348 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Summary judgment

JANNA PURDIE provides practical guidance for  practitioners involved in summary judgment applications

References

Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
Jacobs v Skidmore [2008] All ER (D) 258 (Nov)
CPR 24

Summary judgment
There are obvious steps parties can take to make the court process easier and  strengthen their case. Mr Justice Coulson, in a judgment providing valuable guidance  to practitioners, has highlighted some of these. While some apply specifi cally  to summary judgment applications others apply equally well to other forms of  applications.

Facts of the case

The claimant undertook quantity surveying and project management for a  construction project under a consultancy agreement. The defendant terminated that  agreement and the claimant brought proceedings for unpaid invoices of more than  £4m.

The claimant applied for summary judgment on three of the invoices totalling  £755,643.60. The application was resisted. The time estimate was two hours with no  indication that pre-reading was required. The evidence adduced comprised 10 files, and  included lengthy statements. The application took three days of court time.

The summary judgment was partly successful and a conditional order was also made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll