header-logo header-logo

18 January 2021
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Success for solicitors on legal aid bills

Solicitors have won the right to have civil legal aid bills assessed by specialist judges, following legal action brought by the Law Society
The Lord Chancellor confirmed last week that solicitors can choose to have bills between £2,500 and £25,000 assessed by either the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) or specialist judges, while the LAA consults on the best way for legal aid costs to be assessed in future.

Law Society president David Greene said: ‘It is good news for solicitors and anyone needing legally aided advice that the Law Society’s decisive action has prompted the Lord Chancellor to rethink the way solicitors are paid for civil legal aid work that is so vital to preserving access to justice.

‘We brought this action because the LAA announced changes to the way legal aid costs were assessed without a credible consultation or evidence to support moving cost assessments from the courts into the LAA. Our concern was that the LAA may not have the expertise to assess complex costs―historically it has only assessed very low or pre-agreed legal aid bills―whereas cost judges routinely assess the reasonableness of solicitors’ claims for work on complex cases. 

‘Equally concerning, the LAA has a stake in the outcome of costs assessments―as payments come from its budget―and so it will not always be the appropriate arbiter, whereas a costs judge is in a position to make an impartial, expert assessment. We’re relieved the LAA has agreed to engage in a genuine consultation.’

The LAA announced the change in June, prompting the Law Society to take legal action. The Administrative Court has formally endorsed a settlement of the claim, under the terms of which the Lord Chancellor will imminently announce a consultation on the assessment of civil legal aid bills.

The Law Society said the consultation is expected to run during February 2020 leading to a decision in March or April.

Issue: 7917 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll