header-logo header-logo

Subpostmasters fight on after Horizon compensation letdown

02 July 2020
Categories: Legal News , Costs , Compensation
printer mail-detail
More than 500 former subpostmasters caught up in the faulty Post Office Horizon computer scandal are seeking justice after recovering only five per cent of their losses when the Post Office settled the case due to the Jackson reforms

The Justice for Subpostmaster Alliance (JFSA) is bringing a complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman on behalf of its 555 members. The subpostmasters had their contracts terminated. Many lost their businesses and homes, a number were charged with false accounting and theft, and some even received custodial sentences―yet it was all because of mistakes made by the faulty computer system.

The Post Office subsequently paid £57m to settle the case last year. However, the JFSA says just £11.5m actually made it into the hands of the subpostmasters involved due to the costs of bringing the case. The JFSA says this represents, on average, about 5% of their actual losses.

The JFSA has now instructed law firm Stevens Bolton to act on its behalf, and is submitting a complaint to the Parliamentary Ombudsman alleging maladministration within the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS). The government was the sole shareholder in the Post Office when the scandal happened.

Sarah Murray, head of dispute resolution at Stevens & Bolton, said: ‘Members of the JFSA have been through so much, as a result of the wrongs suffered at the hands of the Post Office.

‘The failure of the government to intervene has exacerbated their suffering.’

Kay Linnell, forensic accountant and adviser to JFSA, said: ‘This is about recovering the considerable legal costs incurred by members in taking the Post Office to court to expose inherent faults in the Post Office’s Horizon computer system, the incompetence of the Post Office and the failings of the government, who as the only shareholder, failed to manage its subsidiary.

‘The 555 claimants who were brave enough to join this group litigation, having already suffered such personal anguish and financial loss, have borne the additional financial burden of funding this action. They cannot recover their funding costs as a result of the Jackson Reforms of 1 April 2013. 

‘It cannot be right that individual impecunious litigants, who have succeeded in their case, are excluded from the equitable repayment of the financing costs. We are still striving for justice to be done and we need help from the public now.’

The JFSA has set up a CrowdJustice platform to help it fund its legal fight. See: www.crowdjustice.com/case/post-office-victims.

Categories: Legal News , Costs , Compensation
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ

An extra bit is being added to case citations to show the pecking order of the judges concerned. Former district judge Stephen Gold has the details, in his ‘Civil way’ column in this week’s NLJ

The Labour government’s position on alternative dispute resolution (ADR) is not yet clear

back-to-top-scroll