header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Striking out

Is there a right to strike? Tom Walker reports

The ability of workers to strike has been brought into sharp focus by recent events.  Over 2009 and 2010 there has been a series of cases in which the UK courts assessed whether irregularities in the balloting process made a strike illegal. Now that job losses and pension reform are certainties across the public sector, there is a fear that public services may be paralysed by industrial action. As the debate becomes intense and highly political, perhaps it is time for a fundamental but fair rethink of the right to strike.

The flaws in the existing system are well illustrated by the approach employers have often taken to industrial action. In order for a strike to be legal under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULCRA), it need only have the support of the majority of balloted union members who actually vote. Take a hypothetical example:  there are 1,000 employees in a workplace but only 500 are union members; all 500 are balloted for strike action; 300 of these are apathetic and do not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll