header-logo header-logo

25 November 2010 / Tom Walker
Issue: 7443 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Striking out

Is there a right to strike? Tom Walker reports

The ability of workers to strike has been brought into sharp focus by recent events.  Over 2009 and 2010 there has been a series of cases in which the UK courts assessed whether irregularities in the balloting process made a strike illegal. Now that job losses and pension reform are certainties across the public sector, there is a fear that public services may be paralysed by industrial action. As the debate becomes intense and highly political, perhaps it is time for a fundamental but fair rethink of the right to strike.

The flaws in the existing system are well illustrated by the approach employers have often taken to industrial action. In order for a strike to be legal under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULCRA), it need only have the support of the majority of balloted union members who actually vote. Take a hypothetical example:  there are 1,000 employees in a workplace but only 500 are union members; all 500 are balloted for strike action; 300 of these are apathetic and do not

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll